Kerr v. . Sanders
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Civil action tried before Greene, J., anda jury at January, 1897 Term of Mecklenburg Superior Court. The facts appear in the opinion. The plaintiff appealed.
1Opinion of the Court
Furches, J.:
Defendants employed the plaintiff to buy cotton for them for a term of six months at the price of $75 per month, each month’s wages to be due at the end. of the month. This contract was substantially made by letter correspondence between the parties commencing in July; but on the 5fch day of September, 1896, they closed the contract, commenced by the letter correspondence, by a formal written contract signed by both parties. In this signed contract, tne defendants reserved the right to dismiss the plaintiff without notice and without further liability to him. The grounds stated in…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Petit v. . WoodliefSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1894
- Long v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1885
- Simpson, Bass & Co. v. PegramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893
- Pruden v. Asheboro & Montgomery RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1897
- King v. . PhillipsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- Thompson v. SolesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
- Carolina Equipment and Parts Company v. AndersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1965
- Ryan v. Progressive Retailer Publishing Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1915
- Moore v. General Accident, Fire, & Life Assurance Corp.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
- Walker v. . BurtSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1921
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.