Legal Opinion
Bergen v. Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Co.
District Court, D. Minnesota
Decided May 6, 2013No. Civ. No. 12-2973 (RHK/JJG)PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER
RICHARD H. KYLE, District Judge.
INTRODUCTION
In this insurance action, Plaintiff Robin Bergen d/b/a R & D Enterprises (“Bergen”) alleges that his former insurer, Defendant Grinnell Mutual Reinsurance Company (“Grinnell”), must defend and indemnify him against claims brought by a third-party in Minnesota state court. Bergen now moves for partial summary judg*868ment on the duty to defend, and Grinnell cross-moves for summary judgment on the duties to defend and indemnify. For the reasons that follow, Bergen’s Motion will be granted and Grinnell’s Motion denied.
BACKGROUND
T…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Hartford Fire Ins. Co. v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance v. BarrySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Weitz Co., LLC v. Lloyd's of LondonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2009
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Walgreen Co. v. Panasonic Healthcare Corporation of North AmericaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2023