Legal Opinion

Mace v. Kennedy

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided February 2, 1888PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Error to Lenawee. (Howell, J.) Assumpsit-.- Defendant brings error. The fai ts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtMorse, J.

The plaintiff in this suit is the holder of a promissory, note for $200, which was obtained in the same manner, for Bohemian oats, as the note in the ease of Sutton v. Beckwith, ante, 303. A bond similar to the one in that case was executed and delivered to the defendant, the maker of the note, at the time the note was given.

The main question at issue upon the trial was the good faith of the plaintiff, who purchased the note before due, and for value.

The note was executed by defendant December 5, 1884, and delivered to one James Armitage. The note was made payable to R. N. Sims, or bearer, 15…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. New York Iron Mine v. Citizens' BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Arnd v. AylesworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1909
  2. Bank v. Ohio Valley Furniture Co.West Virginia Supreme Court · 1905
  3. Green v. WilkieSupreme Court of Iowa · 1896
  4. Goodrich v. McDonaldMichigan Supreme Court · 1889
  5. Central Savings Bank & Trust Co. v. StotterMichigan Supreme Court · 1919

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API