Legal Opinion
Holtzman v. Samuel
New York Supreme Court
Decided October 28, 1985PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Joseph J. Dowd, J.
The District Attorney of Kings County, plaintiff herein (hereinafter called claiming authority [CPLR 1310 (11)]), moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 1317 (2) of the recently enacted CPLR article 13-A (Proceeds of A Crime — Forfeiture), to confirm the ex parte order of attachment dated March 10, 1985 (Honorable Joseph M. Lane). Defendants cross-move for an order pursuant to CPLR 1329 (1), vacating the order of attachment on the grounds that the claiming authority has *977failed to establish: (1) the grounds for the attachment, (2) the need for continuing the…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- Calero-Toledo v. Pearson Yacht Leasing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- North Georgia Finishing, Inc. v. Di-Chem, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1975
- United States v. One Assortment of 89 FirearmsSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Marine Midland Bank v. John E. Russo Produce Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
- AMF Inc. v. Algo Distributors, Ltd.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Kuriansky v. Natural Mold Shoe Corp.New York Supreme Court · 1986
- Kirschenbaum v. Nassau County District Attorney (In Re Vitta)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 2009
- Hynes v. DallasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Morgenthau v. CliffordNew York Supreme Court · 1992
- Holtzman v. BaileyNew York Supreme Court · 1986
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.