Legal Opinion
Holtzman v. Bailey
New York Supreme Court
Decided April 14, 1986PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Gerald Adler, J.
Upon the foregoing papers plaintiff, the District Attorney of Kings County, as claiming authority (CPLR 1310 [11]), moves for an order pursuant to CPLR 1317 (2) of the newly enacted *26CPLR article 13-A (Proceeds Of A Crime — Forfeiture), to confirm the ex parte order of attachment granted on September 26, 1985 (Bellard, J.). On October 31, 1985 plaintiff, as claiming authority, levied upon defendant’s automobile, a 1984 Pontiac, vehicle identification number (VIN) No. 162AW87H3EN201001, as being the instrumentality of a crime. The forfeiture action will seek…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Commonwealth v. ONE 1970, 2 DR. HT LINCOLN AUTO., ETC.Supreme Court of Virginia · 1972
- Holtzman v. SamuelNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Short Stop Industrial Catering Corp. v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- Dillon v. SchiavoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985