Securities & Exchange Commission v. Kings Real Estate Investment Trust
District Court, D. Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO INTERVENE
SEBELIUS, United States Magistrate Judge.
This matter comes before the Court upon the Motion to Intervene filed by Movant E. Paul Anderton (“Anderton”) on April 21, 2004 (Doc. 63). The plaintiff has filed its opposition Anderton’s motion (Doc. 69), and Anderton filed his Reply (Doc. 82). Ander-ton seeks to intervene in the underlying action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “S.E.C.” or the “Commission”) to protest the inclusion of his investment in the assets collected by the Receiver (the “Receivership Assets”)…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Aaron v. Securities & Exchange CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
- Ramona Shump v. Lana Balka, and Wanda Jones, Intervenors-ObjectorsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1978
- United Nuclear Corporation v. Cranford Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1990
- Coalition of Arizona/New Mexico Counties for Stable Economic Growth v. Department of the InteriorCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1996
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Securities & Exchange Commission v. FalorDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2010