Legal Opinion
Dungan v. Independent School Dist. No. 39.
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided March 29, 1938No. 27953PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtHurst, J.
This is an action on a contract employing a superintendent of schools by an independent district. The petition alleges that during the year 1932, the board of education of independent school district No. 39 of Ellis county entered into a written contract with plaintiff whereby he was employed as superintendent for the said school for a period of three years, 1932-1933, 1933-1934, and 1934-1935, and was to receive $225 per month for each school year of nine months; that the contract was performed by both parties for two years; that at the meeting oí the board of education on the first Monday…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Gentis v. HuntSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1925
- Ryan v. HumphriesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
- New York Casualty Co. of New York v. Wallace & Tiernan, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1935
- School District No. 60 of Ellis County v. CrabtreeSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1930
- Wagner v. LandSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1931
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Consolidated School Dist. No. 6 v. Panther Oil & Grease Mfg. Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1946
- Smith v. School Dist. No. 1Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Board of Com'rs of Harmon County v. Oklahoma Tax CommissionSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1944
- Three-In-One Oil & Gas Co. v. BradshawSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1943
- City of Bixby v. State Ex Rel. Department of LaborCourt of Civil Appeals of Oklahoma · 1996
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.