Legal Opinion
Dill v. Johnston
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided May 25, 1926No. 16041PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtMason, J.
This action was commenced by Wm. G. Johnston and W. Frank Davis, as plaintiffs, against W. H. Dill, as defendant, to recover a real estate brokers’ commission for the sale of land.
Thereafter the court sustained the motion of Andy Higgins to be made a party ■defendant, on the grounds that he was a joint owner of snid lands with W. H. Dill, and thac the listing and offering; of the same ■for sale and the sale and conveyance thereof was the joint and partnership action of the said W. H. Dill and Andy Higgins.
The ease was tried to a jury, ana resulted •in a verdict and judgment for the plaintiffs…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Chambers v. Van WagnerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1912
- Shawnee Fire Ins. Co. v. Thompson RowellSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1911
- Ludeman v. EnglishSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
- Remarkis v. ReidSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1917
- Grossman Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1915
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- School Dist. No. 76 v. BathSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926
- First State Bank of Canute v. ThomasSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1949
- Johnston v. DillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Boatman's Bank v. RogersSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1936
- Van Antwerp v. TullerSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1950
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.