Cahill v. Curtiss-Wright Corporation
District Court, W.D. Kentucky
1Opinion of the Court
MILLER, District Judge.
The plaintiff, Frank R. Cahill, Jr., brought this action for himself and for the United States of America against the defendant Curtiss-Wright Corporation, pursuant to the provisions of Title 31 U.S.C.A. §§231 and 232, which deal with actions by informers respecting persons making false claims against the Government. He asks judgment in the penal sum of $2,000, as provided by the statute, and in the further sum of $10,000,000, being double the amount of damage which it is alleged the United States has sustained by reason of the alleged illegal acts complained of. The…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States v. CohnSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- United States Ex Rel. Brensilber v. Bausch & Lomb Optical Co.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1942
- United States Ex Rel. Kessler v. Mercur Corp.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
- Olson v. MellonDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 1933
- Curacao Trading Co. v. William Stake & Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1941
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. GrannisCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1949
- Rolland v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1953
- UMC Electronics Co. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 1999
- Hageny v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- United States v. Fox Lake State BankDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 1963
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.