Legal Opinion
Superhype Publishing, Inc. v. Vasiliou
District Court, S.D. Ohio
Decided September 16, 1993No. C-1-91-767, C-1-93-0181PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND ORDERING INJUNCTION, DAMAGES AND ATTORNEY’S FEES
SPIEGEL, District Judge.
This matter is before the court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Summary Judgment (doe. 19), the Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (doc. 22), and the Plaintiffs’ Reply Memorandum (doc. 23).
BACKGROUND
The Plaintiffs in this case are owners of the copyrights on original musical compositions and are represented by the American Society of Composers, Authors and Publishers (ASCAP). ASCAP was organized by composers as a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Interroyal Corporation, a Delaware Corporation v. Ralph H. Sponseller, and Superior Roll-Forming Company, Inc., an Ohio CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Broadcast Music, Inc. v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1979
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Studios, Inc. v. Grokster, Ltd.District Court, C.D. California · 2007
- Polygram International Publishing, Inc. v. Nevada/TIG, Inc.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1994
- Jobete Music Co. v. Johnson Communications, Inc.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2003
- Microsoft Corp. v. SellersDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
- Marshall & Swift v. BS & a SOFTWAREDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.