Legal Opinion
Microsoft Corp. v. Sellers
District Court, E.D. Tennessee
Decided January 26, 2006No. 1:04-mj-00353PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
PHILLIPS, District Judge.
Plaintiff, Microsoft Corporation (Microsoft), has moved the court for summary judgment in its favor against defendants, Samuel Sellers (Sellers), an individual d/b/a Save More Sales a/k/a Save More Computers (Save More)[ECF #21]. Microsoft further seeks a permanent injunction to prohibit defendants from engaging in any further unauthorized and/or infringing activities [ECF #30]. Defendants, Sellers and Save More, have responded [ECF # 35], Plaintiff has replied [ECF # 37]. For the reasons that follow, plaintiffs motions for summary judgment and a…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Wildlife Express Corporation v. Carol Wright Sales, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1994
- Fonovisa, Inc. v. Cherry Auction, Inc. Richard Pilegard, W.D. Mitchell, Margaret MitchellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Craftex, Inc., and Bobby O'Neal and Keith O'neal, Polo Fashions, Inc. v. Craftex, Inc. Bobby O'Neal and Keith O'NealCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1987
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. NopDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2008
- Disney Enterprises, Inc. v. FarmerDistrict Court, E.D. Tennessee · 2006
- King Records, Inc. v. BennettDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2006
- General Conference Corp. of Seventh-Day Adventists v. McGillDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 2008
- Borescopes R US v. 1800Endoscope. Com, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2010
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.