Legal Opinion

Marshall & Swift v. BS & a SOFTWARE

District Court, W.D. Michigan

Decided June 9, 1994No. 1:93-cv-00265PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION AND ORDER ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

MILES, Senior District Judge.

This is an action for copyright infringement. Plaintiff Marshall and Swift (“Marshall”), which publishes materials used by appraisers and state and local taxing authorities, alleges that the defendants copied certain tables — to which Marshall owns the rights — from versions of the Michigan Assessor’s Manual. Marshall further alleges that the defendants then used those tables in a computer software program which they sold to Michigan assessors.

Marshall has moved for summary judgment on its copyright…

2Cases cited24 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  4. Farrar v. HobbySupreme Court of the United States · 1992
  5. Feist Publications, Inc. v. Rural Telephone Service Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Phinney v. PerlmutterMichigan Court of Appeals · 1997
  2. RBC Nice Bearings, Inc. v. PEER BEARING COMPANYDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2009
  3. Mitchell v. Capitol Records, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2017
  4. Quinn v. City of DetroitDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1997
  5. Specific Software Solutions, LLC v. Institute of Workcomp Advisors, LLCDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2009

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API