Legal Opinion
Potter v. Blackburn
Supreme Court of Delaware
Decided May 25, 2004No. 323,2002PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Justice, for the Majority.
In.this appeal we consider the admissibility of portions of a physician’s testimony relating to causation of injuries arising from a motor vehicle accident. We conclude that the trial judge’s rulings on Motions in Limine challenging the physician’s opinions on the theory that those opinions were allegedly based upon the amount of property damage to colliding vehicles correctly resolved the underlying issues fairly presented to the Court.
Facts
On April 24, 1998, a car driven by the defendant, Judith Blackburn, rear-ended a car driven by the plaintiff, Rosemary…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- M.G. Bancorporation, Inc. v. Le BeauSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- Eskin v. CardenSupreme Court of Delaware · 2004
- Barriocanal v. GibbsSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
- Cunningham v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Delaware · 1997
3Cited by9 opinions
- Powell v. Department of Services for Children, Youth & Their FamiliesSupreme Court of Delaware · 2008
- Shawe v. EltingSupreme Court of Delaware · 2017
- General Motors Corp. v. GrenierSupreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Hilco Capital, LP v. Federal Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2009
- Case v. TaylorSupreme Court of Delaware · 2016
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.