Eskin v. Carden
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
STEELE, Justice:
In this appeal we address for the first time whether biomechanical expert testimony may be admitted in Delaware courts to address the relationship between the physical forces involved in an automobile accident and the cause and severity of an occupant’s alleged injuries. In doing so, we take the opportunity to address and clarify Davis v. Maute,1 in an attempt to provide guidance to Delaware trial judges who are frequently called upon to consider the admissibility of proffered biomechanical expert testimony.
We hold that trial judges may admit qualified biomechanical expert…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
- United States v. John W. DowningCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Chavin v. CopeSupreme Court of Delaware · 1968
- Wheat v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1987
- Koutoufaris v. DickSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by54 opinions
- Bowen v. EI DuPont De Nemours & Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2006
- Tumlinson v. Advanced Micro Devices, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2013
- Christ v. SchwartzCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
- Corriette v. MoralesSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2008
- Sears, Roebuck and Co. v. MidcapSupreme Court of Delaware · 2006
49 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.