Hilco Capital, LP v. Federal Insurance Co.
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
BERGER, Justice:
This appeal involves an insurance coverage dispute that was resolved by a decision granting partial summary judgment to the insurer, followed by a jury verdict responding to three special interrogatories, also in favor of the insurer. Appellants argue that the trial court erred in holding that: (1) the insurer had no implied duty of good faith to consider a settlement of appellants’ claims; and (2) the insurer’s consent was required before the claims could be settled. In addition, appellants challenge several evidentiary rulings at trial as well as certain jury instructions.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Schwartz v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2008
- Farmers' Electric Cooperative, Inc. v. Missouri Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1998
- Gulf Insurance Co. v. Noble BroadcastSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
- City of St. Joseph v. Lake Contrary Sewer DistrictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008
- Corbitt v. TatagariSupreme Court of Delaware · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Pedrick v. RotenDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 2014
- Trombley v. Bank of America Corp.District Court, D. Rhode Island · 2009
- Apollo Education v. National Union Fire InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Apollo Education v. National Union Fire InsuranceArizona Supreme Court · 2021
- Arch Insurance Company v. MurdockSuperior Court of Delaware · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.