State v. Lindsly
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.
Defendant appeals the imposition of restitution in the amount of $36,840 after his conviction for computer crime. ORS 164.377. He admitted that he had knowingly and fraudulently gained access to and used a computer and part of a computer network owned by Pacific Northwest Bell. He argues that $1,000 in long distance phone calls was the only expense attributable to his criminal activity. Consequently, he contends that the remaining $35,840 in investigative expenses incurred by the telephone company is not an injury that qualifies as pecuniary damages under ORS 137.103(2).
ORS 137.106(1)…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- State v. TumaOregon Supreme Court · 1981
- State v. LoudenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990
3Cited by7 opinions
- State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
- State v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
- State v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
- State v. A. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.