Legal Opinion

State v. Lindsly

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided April 3, 1991No. C8906-33347; CA A63293PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRossman, J.

Defendant appeals the imposition of restitution in the amount of $36,840 after his conviction for computer crime. ORS 164.377. He admitted that he had knowingly and fraudulently gained access to and used a computer and part of a computer network owned by Pacific Northwest Bell. He argues that $1,000 in long distance phone calls was the only expense attributable to his criminal activity. Consequently, he contends that the remaining $35,840 in investigative expenses incurred by the telephone company is not an injury that qualifies as pecuniary damages under ORS 137.103(2).

ORS 137.106(1)…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. State v. HeathCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  2. State v. TumaOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  3. State v. LoudenCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1990

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. State v. WilsonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
  2. State v. AllenSupreme Court of Kansas · 1996
  3. State v. MarquezCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1996
  4. State v. MahoneyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1992
  5. State v. A. P.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2025

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API