Legal Opinion

Brand v. Fernandez

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 30, 1935No. 9599PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The appeal rests upon a voluminous record, through which the main transaction winds a sinuous and complicated course, which may be delineated only by a full statement of the material facts. As the judgment rests upon a directed verdict, we are without the benefit of authoritative findings of fact, which must be here eked out of the record and, where issuable, resolved, not in support of the judgment, but against appellees. This rule of presumption arises from the action of the trial court in taking the case from the jury and directing their verdict as if all the evidence raised only questions…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Greenwall Theatrical Circuit Co. v. MarkowitzTexas Supreme Court · 1904
  2. Amarillo Nat. Bank v. HarrellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  3. Houston Ice & Brewing Co. v. ClintCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1913
  4. Shaw v. BorchersTexas Commission of Appeals · 1932
  5. Sabine Tram Co. v. T. Bancroft & SonsCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1897

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Lurie v. Arizona Fertilizer & Chemical Co.Arizona Supreme Court · 1966
  2. Lynch Davidson v. HinnantCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Fry v. HarkeyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API