Legal Opinion

Lurie v. Arizona Fertilizer & Chemical Co.

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided December 7, 1966No. 7877PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

McFarland, justice.

Appellants bring this appeal from a directed verdict and judgment against them in the lower court. Melvin Lurie, Alan Lurie, Tolbert Lurie, and Meyer Lurie, hereinafter designated the Luries, were engaged in the hotel and construction business in Washington, California, Arizona, and several other States. The Luries controlled or were the sole stockholders of over twenty separate corporations, one of which was Allied Yuma Farms, Inc., a Washington corporation licensed to do business in Arizona. Allied Yuma Farms, Inc., was engaged in farming operations in Arizona, producing…

2Cases cited18 opinions

  1. Wenban Estate, Inc. v. HewlettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
  2. Pearce v. Madison & Indianapolis RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1859
  3. Keyes v. NimsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1919
  4. Norwegian Old People's Home Society v. WilsonIllinois Supreme Court · 1898
  5. Dexter & Carpenter, Inc. v. HoustonCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1927

13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spurlock v. Santa Fe Pacific RailroadCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1984
  2. Lovering v. Seabrook Island Property Owners Ass'nCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 1986
  3. Kitchell Corporation v. HermansenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1968
  4. Rubi v. Transamerica Title InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1981
  5. Pence v. GlacyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2004

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API