Legal Opinion

Lynch Davidson v. Hinnant

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided January 29, 1936No. 9728PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

SMITH, Chief Justice.

On October 15, 1926, George C. Rehmet .and another purchased two lots, in the city of Alice, from Mrs. W. A. Hinnant, and as part of the purchase price executed and delivered to the grantor five vendor’s lien notes for $500 each, one of which was aft-erwards paid, and the other four were later acquired by A. A. and King Flinnant, appel-lees herein. Subsequently Rehmet and his associate conveyed the lots to Lynch Davidson & Co., who assumed to pay the four unpaid vendor’s lien notes mentioned.

Later, in a suit brought and still pending in the sixty-first district court of…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Craver v. GreerTexas Supreme Court · 1915
  2. Kirby v. Dilworth & MarshallTexas Commission of Appeals · 1924
  3. Glenn v. ConnellCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Brand v. FernandezCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1935

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. First Southern Properties, Inc. v. ValloneTexas Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Maverick County Water Control & Improvement District No. 1 v. City of LaredoCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1961
  3. Farrell v. SienCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1940
  4. Untitled Texas Attorney General Opinion, Texas Attorney General Reports1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API