Legal Opinion
Picou v. Curole
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 31, 1950No. 3194PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
44 So.2d 354 (1950)
PICOU et al.
v.
CUROLE.
No. 3194.
Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit.
January 31, 1950.
Knobloch & Knobloch, Thibodaux, for appellant.
Harvey Peltier, Thibodaux, for appellee.
JONES, Judge ad hoc.
This is an action in boundary. The allegations of the petition show that plaintiff acquired the property described in Article I of the petition in the year 1947; that said property was bounded on the South by the lands of the defendant herein, and that the boundary lines between the contiguous estates has never been established even though a fence had been erected by the defendant…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Opdenwyer v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- Williams v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- Blanchard v. MonroseLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
3Cited by14 opinions
- Sessum v. HemperleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Jones v. DyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- James v. Le BlancLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1957
- Branch v. HinsonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1966
- Carpenter v. CobbLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1974
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.