Legal Opinion
James v. Le Blanc
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 2, 1957No. 4399PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
TATE, Judge.
This is a boundary action. Both parties appeal from the boundary as fixed by the trial court.
The adjacent properties concerned lie in the South East Quarter of Section 22, Township 9 South, Range 3 East, SE La. District. This entire quarter section in Ascension Parish was originally owned by J. E. LeBlanc, the father of defendant and the grandfather of plaintiff. To simplify our discussion, below is a diagram of said quarter section. The tracts therein are denoted as “A”, “B”, “C”, and “X” by ourselves :
*177The Boundary sought to be established by this suit is that dividing Tract “C”…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Opdenwyer v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Waterman v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1947
- Dufrene v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1938
- Lewis v. KingSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Plaquemines Oil & Development Co. v. StateSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1945
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Marcann Outdoor, Inc. v. HargroveLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Hulin v. HaleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1962
- Girard v. DonlonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1961
- Tynes v. KellyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1959
- Owens v. T. Miller & Sons Building Supply Co.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1958
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.