Legal Opinion
Blanchard v. Monrose
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided January 27, 1930No. 13,122PublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJanvier, J.
The preliminary facts of this case are so nearly identical with those in the matter entitled Carr vs. Geoghegan, 11 La. App. 74, 123 So. 371, decided by us, on June 10, 1929, that we have decided to adopt, in a large measure,»the statement of fact as it appears in that case.
This is an action in boundary. The line in dispute is that which forms or should form the rear line of most of the properties fronting on Audubon boulevard. The old Foucher plantation formerly comprised the ¡property which is now occupied by Tulane University, Loyola University, and the properties fronting' on both sides…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Opdenwyer v. BrownSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1924
- Williams v. BernsteinSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1899
- Barker v. Houssiere-Latreille Oil Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1925
- Gray v. CouvillonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1857
- Frederick v. BrulardSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1851
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Weathersby v. HogsettLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1930
- Sessum v. HemperleySupreme Court of Louisiana · 1957
- Picou v. CuroleLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1950
- Jones v. DyerLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1954
- Prather v. ValienLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1976
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.