Legal Opinion

Griffith v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 13, 1991No. B045115PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

ASHBY, Acting P. J.

The issue presented by this appeal is: Prior to the filing of a lawsuit or another formal proceeding, can a third party claimant require an insurance carrier to release the policy limits of an insurance contract?

Facts

Marian P. Griffith and Cecilio Guerra (hereinafter Claimants) each retained Attorney Curtis L. Gemmil to represent them in personal injury lawsuits arising from two separate motor vehicle accidents. The other persons involved in the accidents were both insured by State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company, a corporation (hereinafter Insurer).…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Blank v. KirwanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Moradi-Shalal v. Fireman's Fund Ins. CompaniesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  3. Leal v. Holy Spirit Ass'n for Unification of World ChristianityCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. White v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Murphy v. Allstate InsuranceCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Boicourt v. Amex Assurance Co.California Court of Appeal · 2000
  2. Madrigal v. Allstate Insurance Co.District Court, C.D. California · 2016
  3. Cogan v. Triad American EnergyDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 1996
  4. Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000
  5. Connecticut Indemnity Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 2000

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API