Madrigal v. Allstate Insurance Co.
District Court, C.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT ALLSTATE INDEMNITY COMPANY’S MOTION FOR JUDGMENT AS A MATTER OF LAW (Dkt. No. 281) AND MOTION FOR NEW TRIAL (Dkt. No. 282)
SUZANNE H. SEGAL, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
I
INTRODUCTION
On April 21, 2014, Plaintiffs Carlos Madrigal (“Madrigal”), Richard Tang and Anna Tang (the “Tangs”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) filed suit in state court against Defendant Allstate Indemnity Company (“Allstate”)1 alleging claims arising from Allstate’s failure to accept a settlement demand. Allstate removed the action to federal court on June 2, 2014 on the basis of diversity…
2Cases cited91 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
- J. Wilkerson v. B. WheelerCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2014
- Jones v. WilliamsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- Harper v. City of Los AngelesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2008
86 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- San Diego Comic Convention, Non-Profit Corp. v. Dan Farr Prods.District Court, S.D. California · 2018
- Anton Toutov v. Curative Labs Inc.District Court, C.D. California · 2024
- Gallardo-Pinedo v. Aegis Security Insurance CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- PARKER v. LEEDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2024