Legal Opinion

Teel v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 5, 1936No. 17903PublishedCited by 5 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

The offense is driving an automobile while intoxicated; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for one year.

The appeal bond appearing in the record is insufficient to authorize consideration of the appeal by this court for the reason that it is not approved by the trial judge. The statute, Art. 818, C. C. P., requires that the bond be approved by both the judge and the sheriff. See Wood v. State, 83 S.W.2d 670, and cases cited.

The appeal bond is also defective in that it fails to state that appellant has been convicted of a felony, as is required by Art. 817, C. C. P. See Moore…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wood v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  2. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Wells v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Ringer Ringer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  2. Dickerson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1943
  3. Farris v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  4. Moore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938
  5. Randolph v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1938

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API