Legal Opinion

Wood v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided April 24, 1935No. 17553PublishedCited by 6 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

MORROW, Presiding Judge.

Theft is the offense; penalty assessed at confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The appeal bond which appears in the record is insufficient to authorize consideration of the appeal by this court for the reason that it is not approved by the judge who presided in the trial of the case. See article 818, C. C. P., 1925; also Baker v. State, 113 Texas Crim. Rep., 120; Shadwick v. State, 122 Texas Crim. Rep., 70; Boggs v. State, 75 S. W. (2d) 680.

The appeal will be dismissed upon the authority stated. If the, appellant desires to perfect his appeal within fifteen…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Baker v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1929
  2. Shadwick v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1932
  3. Boggs v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1934

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Teel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  2. Bell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1935
  3. Boggus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  4. Boggus v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  5. Morales v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API