Legal Opinion

Randolph v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided May 4, 1938No. 19697Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Christian, Judge.

The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.

The appeal bond is defective in that it fails to state that appellant has been convicted of a felony, as is required by Article 817, C. C. P. Teel v. State, 91 S. W. (2d) 747. It is recited in the bond that appellant “stands charged with the offense of a felony, to-wit: theft of an automobile of the value of more than fifty dollars.” Nowhere is it shown that there was a conviction. See Wall v. State, 7 S. W. (2d) 958.

Appellant being enlarged under a fatally defective appeal bond, this Court is…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Teel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API