Randolph v. State
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas
The opinion states the case.
1Opinion of the Court
Christian, Judge.
The offense is theft; the punishment, confinement in the penitentiary for two years.
The appeal bond is defective in that it fails to state that appellant has been convicted of a felony, as is required by Article 817, C. C. P. Teel v. State, 91 S. W. (2d) 747. It is recited in the bond that appellant “stands charged with the offense of a felony, to-wit: theft of an automobile of the value of more than fifty dollars.” Nowhere is it shown that there was a conviction. See Wall v. State, 7 S. W. (2d) 958.
Appellant being enlarged under a fatally defective appeal bond, this Court is…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Wall v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
- Teel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936