Legal Opinion

Ringer Ringer v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 21, 1938No. 20054PublishedCited by 20 opinions

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion of the Court

Appellants were convicted of a felony in Irion County, and are in this Court on an appeal therefrom.

The appeal bond is defective in that it does not recite that appellants have been convicted of a felony. We have heretofore held in Ex parte Hagler, 28 S.W.2d 550: "It is essential, under the statute, that it be stated in the bond that the accused had been convicted of a felony. Articles 817 and 818, C. C. P.; Read v. State, 109 Tex.Crim. R.,4 S.W.2d 547." Also see Teel v. State, 91 S.W.2d 747, and cases there cited.

This appeal will be dismissed, and appellants granted fifteen days from this…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Read v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1928
  2. Teel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1936
  3. Ex Parte HaglerCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1930

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Garcia v. DialCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  2. Flores v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1972
  3. Thompson v. ThompsonNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1956
  4. Poore v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1975
  5. State v. BlevinsSupreme Court of Missouri · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API