Legal Opinion

Stuart v. Department of Correction

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided January 28, 1992No. 14331PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBerdon, J.

The issue in this appeal is whether an injured state employee is entitled to full salary benefits pursuant to General Statutes § 5-142 (a)1 solely on the basis of his membership in an enumerated group of state employees. The workers’ compensation commissioner determined that the plaintiff, Ronald Stuart (claimant), had suffered a compensable work related injury in his employment with the defendant, the department of correction (state); and thus, he was entitled to full salary benefits pursuant to § 5-142 (a) during his period of total incapacity. On appeal by the state, the compensation…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. KishSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. State v. HillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
  3. Cilley v. LamphereSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Lucarelli v. StateConnecticut Appellate Court · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Hatt v. Burlington Coat FactorySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2003
  2. State v. GuckianConnecticut Appellate Court · 1992
  3. State v. EhlersSupreme Court of Connecticut · 2000
  4. Skakel v. BenedictConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
  5. McNulty v. City of StamfordConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API