Legal Opinion
Skakel v. Benedict
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided August 5, 1999No. AC 19160PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
LAVERY, J.
The plaintiff, Michael Skakel, appeals from the trial court’s denial of his application for injunctive relief. On appeal, the plaintiff claims that the trial court improperly (1) concluded that the information sought by the defendant, Jonathan Benedict,1 was not protected by our statutory psychiatrist-patient privilege, (2) failed to apply the federal administrative regulations that were in effect at the time he received treatment for alcohol abuse and (3) determined that the state’s delay in asserting its alleged right to information concerning his treatment for alcohol…
2Cases cited51 opinions
- Landgraf v. USI Film ProductsSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Cort v. AshSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Bowen v. Georgetown University HospitalSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Willow Springs Condominium Ass'n v. Seventh BRT Development Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Berry v. LoiseauSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1992
46 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Noffsinger v. SSC Niantic Operating Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 2017
- State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. TullySupreme Court of Connecticut · 2016
- State v. CyrConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- State v. NesteriakConnecticut Appellate Court · 2000
- Lepage Homes, Inc. v. Planning & Zoning CommissionConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.