Legal Opinion

Fenner & Hardenburgh v. Sanborn

New York Supreme Court

Decided May 12, 1862PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from an order of the county judge of Genesee county imposing a fine of $500 on the defendant, for th'e violation of an injunction order made by said judge in a proceeding in this action supplemental to execution.

1Opinion of the Court

By the Court,

Hoyt, J.

The injunction order in this case required the defendant to appear before the county judge on the 8th of August, 1861, to be examined on oath as to his property, and by it the defendant was forbidden to transfer or make any other disposition of any property belonging to him not exempt by law from execution, or in any manner to interfere therewith, until further order in the premises. The defendant was, on said 8th day of August, examined before a referee appointed by said county judge, and on such examination disclosed the fact that he was the owner of 160 acres of land…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Mitchell v. BunchNew York Court of Chancery · 1831
  2. Lansing v. EastonNew York Court of Chancery · 1839
  3. M'Credie v. E. & R. SeniorNew York Court of Chancery · 1834

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Newton v. BuckCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1896
  2. Pouliot v. West India Fruit Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1933
  3. Moyer v. MoyerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1896
  4. United States v. RossDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1961
  5. Clan Renald v. WyckoffThe Superior Court of New York City · 1877

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API