Lansing v. Easton
New York Court of Chancery
This case came before the court upon two attachments ' against the defendants; the one upon the application of the complainants for an alleged breach of the injunction, and the other upon the relation of the receiver, for the neglect of the defendants to deliver over their property to him according to the order of the court. ,
1Opinion of the Court
The Chancellor.
The answers of the defendants to the interrogatories, in connection with their original examination before the master, show a palpable breach of the injunction in this case, by each of them. The ordinary injunction upon a creditor’s bill, which only operates upon the defendant, will not of course prevent another judgment creditor from levying upon property of the defendant which is the propeqsubject of a levy and sale on execution ; before the title of the defendant in such property is equitably divested, by an order for a sequestration thereof or for the appointment of a…
2Cited by24 opinions
- First National Bank v. . ShulerNew York Court of Appeals · 1897
- People v. ComptonThe Superior Court of New York City · 1853
- Kitchen v. . LoweryNew York Court of Appeals · 1891
- First National Bank v. GageIllinois Supreme Court · 1879
- Kanter v. Clerk of the Circuit CourtAppellate Court of Illinois · 1903
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.