Legal Opinion
State v. Fleming
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided January 10, 1995No. 11816PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtFreedman, J.
The defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction, following a jury trial, of conspiracy to commit robbery in the first degree in violation of General Statutes §§ 53a-134 (a) (2)1 and 53a-48.2 The *558defendant claims that the trial court improperly (1) admitted the prior statement of a witness for substantive purposes, (2) admitted evidence that was more prejudicial than probative, and (3) gave a “missing witness” instruction under the Secondino rule. The defendant additionally argues that there was insufficient evidence to establish the essential elements of conspiracy. Finally, the defendant…
2Cases cited32 opinions
- California v. TybergSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- State v. WhelanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1986
- Secondino v. New Haven Gas Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1960
- State v. RossSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- State v. MorrillSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1985
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- State v. MaiaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1998
- State v. TaylorConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. BattleConnecticut Appellate Court · 1995
- State v. JamesConnecticut Appellate Court · 2002
- State v. FlemingSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.