Legal Opinion
Hickman v. Johnson
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 21, 1918No. Civ. No. 1780PublishedCited by 12 opinions
The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.
1Opinion of the CourtBurnett, J.
This appeal is from the judgment decreeing the foreclosure of a mortgage and from the order denying the motion for a new trial.
The only complaint against the action of the court is based upon the order sustaining the demurrer to the amended cross-complaint and dismissing it from the files.
The action was brought upon several promissory notes for the sum of $24,075 and interest and for the foreclosure of a mortgage to secure the payment of the same. The notes provided that in case of a failure to pay the interest, as it became due, the payee might elect to consider the whole amount due and…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hines v. BrodeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Whitney v. . AllaireNew York Court of Appeals · 1848
- Rheingans v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1911
3Cited by12 opinions
- Coury Bros. Ranches, Inc. v. EllsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1968
- Paolini v. SulprizioCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
- Squire's Department Store, Inc. v. DudumCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1953
- Mackenzie Oil Co. v. Omar Oil & Gas Co.Superior Court of Delaware · 1929
- California Credit & Collection Corp. v. GoodinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1926
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.