Mackenzie Oil Co. v. Omar Oil & Gas Co.
Superior Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
Harrington, J.,
delivering the opinion of the court:
Before considering this case, perhaps we should state that it is conceded that by reason of the agreement of counsel, referred to in the statement of facts, no advantage can be taken of the fact that the T and B Pipe Line Company was not also made a party defendant in this action.
While now questioned by the defendant company, the guaranty by that company of the notes given by Clark is alleged in the complaint and is admitted in the answer filed by it. Further than that, its responsibility to the plaintiff of the notes in question is expressly…
2Cases cited46 opinions
- Northern Pacific Railroad v. BabcockSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- George v. HesseTexas Supreme Court · 1906
- Smith v. BollesSupreme Court of the United States · 1889
- Sigafus v. PorterSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Dushane v. BenedictSupreme Court of the United States · 1887
41 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Stephenson v. Capano Development, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1983
- Riley v. New York Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1942
- E.I. duPont De Nemours & Co. v. Florida Evergreen FoliageSupreme Court of Delaware · 1999
- Clark v. Teeven Holding Co., Inc.Court of Chancery of Delaware · 1992
- Stentor Electric Mfg. Co. v. Klaxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1942
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.