Hill v. United Fruit Company
District Court, S.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MATHES, District Judge.
This cause having come before the Court for hearing upon the order to show cause why the case should not be remanded to the State Court and the motion of libelant, subsequently filed, to dismiss the action “as against the fictitiously named defendants [respondents], Doe I, Doe II and Doe III”, and to transfer the case “to the law docket of this Court as an action at law”; and the matters having been heard and submitted for decision; and it appearing to the Court that:(1) the action was originally commenced in the Superior Court of the State of California in and for the…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Shamrock Oil & Gas Corp. v. SheetsSupreme Court of the United States · 1941
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Guaranty Trust Co. v. YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Hugev v. Dampskisaktieselskabet InternationalDistrict Court, S.D. California · 1959
- Wilsey Poirrier v. Nicklos Drilling CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Thompson v. GillenDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1980
- F & L DRUG CORP. v. American Central Insurance Co.District Court, D. Connecticut · 1961
- Asher v. Pacific Power and Light CompanyDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1965
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.