Legal Opinion

Hugev v. Dampskisaktieselskabet International

District Court, S.D. California

Decided January 21, 1959No. Civ. 20340PublishedCited by 61 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MATHES, District Judge.

Plaintiff commenced this action in the State court under the “saving to suitors” clause [28 U.S.C. § 1333(1)] to recover damages for personal injuries alleged to-have been sustained on April 19, 1955, as a proximate consequence of unseaworthiness and negligence, while plaintiff was working as a longshoreman engaged in discharging cargo from defendant’s M S Castleville docked in navigable-waters at the Port of Los Angeles. Pope & Talbot v. Hawn, 1953, 346 U.S. 406, 409, 411, 419, 74 S.Ct. 202, 98 L.Ed. 143 ;. Williams v. Tidewater Associated Oil Co., 9 Cir., 1955, 227…

2Cases cited48 opinions

  1. Seas Shipping Co. v. SierackiSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
  2. Ryan Stevedoring Co. v. Pan-Atlantic Steamship Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  3. Pope & Talbot, Inc. v. HawnSupreme Court of the United States · 1953
  4. Kermarec v. Compagnie Generale TransatlantiqueSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
  5. The OsceolaSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

43 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by61 opinions

  1. Italia Societa Rer Azioni Di Navigazione v. Oregon Stevedoring Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1964
  2. Howlett v. Birkdale Shipping Co., S.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
  3. Federal Marine Terminals, Inc. v. Burnside Shipping Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1969
  4. Halliburton Company and Continental Casualty Company v. Norton Drilling Company and Liberty Mutual Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1962
  5. Metropolitan Stevedore Company, a Corporation v. Dampskisaktieselskabet International, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

56 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API