Legal Opinion
Asher v. Pacific Power and Light Company
District Court, N.D. California
Decided November 5, 1965No. Civ. 9438PublishedCited by 29 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MacBRIDE, District Judge.
This is a diversity action for damages sustained by the plaintiffs as a result of flooding connected with the disastrous floods occurring in Northern California during the latter part of 1964 and early 1965. The complaint was originally filed in the Superior Court of Siskiyou County, California, and was subsequently removed to this Court by the defendant, Pacific Power and Light Company. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1441. The plaintiffs have filed a motion to remand. Title 28 U.S.C. § 1447.
The Facts
All of the plaintiffs reside in California. The only named defendant is…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Reid v. CovertSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Pullman Co. v. JenkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1939
- Chicago, Rock Island & Pacific Railway Co. v. SchwyhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1913
- Heimann v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1947
- Frustuck v. City of FairfaxCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by29 opinions
- Charles E. Abels and Irene C. Abels v. State Farm Fire & Casualty CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1985
- Ed Freeman and Wife Sharon Freeman, Cross-Appellants v. Northwest Acceptance Corporation, Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Chism v. National Heritage Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1981
- Kaneshiro v. North American Co. for Life & Health InsuranceDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1980
- Goldberg v. CPC International, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 1980
24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.