Legal Opinion

Britton Realty Co. v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

New York Supreme Court

Decided November 3, 1988Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

William J. Davis, J.

Pursuant to CPLR article 78, petitioner, Britton Realty Co., seeks an order reversing, annulling and setting aside an order denying the petitioner maximum based rent increases. In the alternative, petitioner seeks an order compelling respondent *684to render a determination on petitioner’s application within 30 days, and grant a discretionary stay of the order.

Petitioner is the owner of premises located at 141 East 56th Street, New York, New York. On September 11, 1987, respondent, the State Division of Housing and Community Renewal (hereinafter DHCR)…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Sullivan v. SiebertAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1979
  2. Chessin v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  3. Stutzman v. FaheyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1978
  4. Ista Management Co. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  5. Tracey Tower Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API