Legal Opinion
Tracey Tower Realty Co. v. New York State Division of Housing & Community Renewal
New York Supreme Court
Decided May 30, 1986PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
Harold Tompkins, J.
The petitioners in this proceeding seek to compel the Division of Housing and Community Renewal (hereinafter DHCR) to process and issue final administrative order on all major *175capital improvement (MCI) rent increases pending within 30 days and further directing that owners with pending MCI increases be entitled to collect the increases sought pending issuance of a final administrative disposition. For the reasons stated below, the petition is dismissed.
On April 1, 1984, pursuant to the Omnibus Housing Act (L 1983, ch 403, §§ 16, 18, 20) DHCR is the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hamptons Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
- Chessin v. New York City Conciliation & Appeals BoardAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Brown v. New York State Department of Social ServicesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- City of New York v. New York State Department of Environment ConservationAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1982
- Cohalan v. CaputoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Audubon Avenue Associates v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1990
- Britton Realty Co. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988
- Clarendon Management Corp. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988