Legal Opinion

Ista Management Co. v. State Division of Housing & Community Renewal

New York Supreme Court

Decided March 10, 1988PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Israel Rubin, J.

By way of an order to show cause, petitioner seeks an order of mandamus, pursuant to CPLR article 78, compelling respondent Division of Housing and Community Renewal to stay enforcement of District Rent Administrator’s orders to roll back rent and refund the overcharge and further compelling respondent to determine its petition for administrative review of the subject orders. The order to show cause (Sandifer, J.) commencing this proceeding provides for a temporary stay upon the establishment of an escrow account for the deposit of all rent collected by…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Hamptons Hospital & Medical Center, Inc. v. MooreNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  2. 140 West 57th Street Corp. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  3. Bloom v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Martin v. AmbachAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. Pokoik v. Department of Health Services of County of SuffolkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Raynes Associates Ltd. Partnership v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  2. Gardner v. Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1995
  3. Britton Realty Co. v. State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Gianelli v. New York State Division of Housing & Community RenewalNew York Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Matter of Buffalo Schools Renovation ProgramNew York Supreme Court · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API