Legal Opinion

Williams v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided December 23, 1903PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the District Court of Bexar. Tried below before Hon. J. L. Camp.

1Opinion of the Court

Suit by appellant against appellee to recover damages for personal injuries occasioned by the alleged negligence of the latter.

The railroad company plead not guilty and contributory negligence. This appeal is from a judgment in its favor.

The evidence is amply sufficient to show that appellee was not guilty of the negligence charged, and that appellant's injuries were caused by contributory negligence on his part.

As all the assignments of error, except one, which complains of the sufficiency of the evidence to support the verdict, are directed against the court's charge, we will, after stating…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Missouri, Kansas & Texas Railway Co. v. McGlamoryTexas Supreme Court · 1896
  2. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co. v. WashingtonTexas Supreme Court · 1901
  3. International & Great Northern Railway Co. v. NeffTexas Supreme Court · 1894
  4. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. HillTexas Supreme Court · 1902
  5. Gulf, Colorado & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. RowlandTexas Supreme Court · 1897

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Ratteree v. Galveston, Harrisburg & San Antonio Railway Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1904
  2. Wichita Falls S. R. Co. v. TuckerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1924
  3. Adskim v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1929
  4. McKee v. BowlinSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
  5. Missouri, K. & T. Ry. Co. of Texas v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1916

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API