Adskim v. Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Co.
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtBean, J.
Plaintiff assigns as negligence the placing of said pile of gravel and cinders, between said passing and main track, obstructing the footpath, prior to the accident, the maintaining of said pile of gravel and cinders there at the time of the accident, and the failure of defendant to place a light thereon or visible signal of warning, or to warn plaintiff of the presence of the gravel and cinders.
Defendant, by its answer, denied the principal allegations of plaintiff’s complaint and pleaded plaintiff’s assumption of risk as a defense. At the appropriate time the defendant moved for a nonsuit…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Second Employers'liability CasesSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. HortonSupreme Court of the United States · 1914
- New York Central Railroad Company v. WinfieldSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Seaboard Air Line Railway v. RennSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Terre Haute & Indianapolis Railroad v. McCorkleIndiana Supreme Court · 1895
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Haskins v. Southern Pacific Co.California Court of Appeal · 1934
- Christie v. Great Northern Railway Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Jackson v. United Railways Co.Oregon Supreme Court · 1933
- Dullum v. Northern Life InsuranceOregon Supreme Court · 1942
- Sutherland v. WickeyOregon Supreme Court · 1929
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.