Legal Opinion
McKee v. Bowlin
Supreme Court of Oklahoma
Decided October 11, 1938No. 27108PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PER' CURIAM.
This appeal presents error from the district court of Tulsa county. The action was one to recover damages for personal injuries and was instituted by the defendant in error, H. D. Bowlin, as plaintiff, against Mrs. W. R. McKee and one W. P. Allen, as defendants. The parties will hereafter be referred to as they appeared in the trial court.
The plaintiff alleges that while in the employ of the defendant W. P. Allen and engaged in the transportation of certain cattle belonging to the defendant Mrs. W. R. McKee he was injured as the result of certain concurrent acts of negligence on…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Atchison, T. & S. F. Ry. Co. v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. BartonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
- Forsell v. Pittsburgh & Montana Copper Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1909
- Clinkscales v. MundkoskiSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1938
- Chicago, R. I. & P. Ry. Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- M & P Stores, Inc. v. TaylorSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1958
- Hayes v. Oklahoma CitySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1940
- Oklahoma Natural Gas Co. v. SmithSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941