Legal Opinion
Robert S. Catz v. Susan R. Chalker and Fidelity Investments
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit
Decided February 13, 2001No. 96-3114, 96-5776PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The panel in this case has considered the petition for rehearing filed by the appellants, the letter from appellees suggesting corrections treated as a petition for rehearing, and the additional citations provided. The petitions for rehearing are denied, except to the extent incorporated in the following changes to the original opinion:
* At page 5, 3rd paragraph, last line. Strike “an undetermined date in 1995.” and insert “January 11, 1995.”
* On page 6, line 4. Change “March 13” to “March 14”
* At page 6, line 5. Change “the following day,” to “on March 31,”
Appellants request that the…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Catz v. ChalkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998
3Cited by27 opinions
- Barbara Habich v. City of Dearborn John Cascardo and John NagyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2003
- Saker v. National City Corp.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2004
- Terry Krukemyer v. James ForcumCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2012
- Donaldson v. Lopez (In Re Lopez)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2002
- United States v. Marion L. Kincaid TrustDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2006
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.