Legal Opinion

Saker v. National City Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided January 26, 2004No. 02-3587PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BATCHELDER, Circuit Judge.

Nazih Saker (“Saker”) appeals the decision of the district court granting summary judgment in favor of National City Corp. (“National City”) on Saker’s claims for trespass, conversion and negligence stemming from National City’s taking possession of Saker’s residence following a state court judgment in foreclosure and a sheriffs sale of the premises. Because we conclude that the district court lacked subject matter jurisdiction based upon the principles announced in the Rooker-Feld-man doctrine, we will vacate the judgment of the district court and remand the case…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
  3. Pennzoil Co. v. Texaco Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
  4. Keene Corp. v. CassCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
  5. Catz v. ChalkerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1998

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. 232 W Mason LLC v. Jackson, City ofDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025
  2. Atlantica LLC v. SalahuddinDistrict Court, S.D. Ohio · 2024
  3. Daniel S. Greenberg v. Judge Anne C. Martin et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
  4. Gary Montgomery v. Philip E. Smith et al.District Court, M.D. Tennessee · 2026
  5. Moniz v. WeipertDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 2021

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API