Legal Opinion

Harris v. City of Allen Park

Michigan Court of Appeals

Decided February 18, 1992No. Docket 126634PublishedCited by 29 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConnor, J.

We granted defendants’ application for leave to appeal from the February 14, 1990, order of the trial court denying defendants’ motion for partial summary disposition that alleged that plaintiffs’ action was time-barred for certain members of the plaintiff class. We reverse the trial court’s order denying summary disposition.

On January 1, 1984, defendant City of Allen Park amended its retirement plan, increasing the level of benefits. Before that time, persons retiring, and particularly those terminating their service with the city and accepting a lump-sum distribution of vested benefits,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Paterek v. 6600 Ltd.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  2. Thomas v. Process Equipment Corp.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1986
  3. Kassab v. Michigan Basic Property InsuranceMichigan Court of Appeals · 1990
  4. Smith v. Department of TreasuryMichigan Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. In Re Easterbrook EstateMichigan Court of Appeals · 1982

3Cited by29 opinions

  1. Huron Tool and Engineering Co. v. Precision Consulting Services, Inc.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Adams v. AdamsMichigan Court of Appeals · 2007
  3. H J Tucker & Associates, Inc. v. Allied Chucker & Engineering Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Blazer Foods, Inc v. Restaurant Properties, IncMichigan Court of Appeals · 2004
  5. Seyburn, Kahn, Ginn, Bess, Deitch & Serlin, PC v. BakshiMichigan Supreme Court · 2009

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API