Legal Opinion

People v. Russell

California Court of Appeal

Decided May 23, 2005No. B171492PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

JOHNSON, J.

“ ‘[W]hether the pitcher hits the stone or the stone hits the pitcher, it will be bad for the pitcher.’ Miguel de Cervantes, Don Quixote, Part II, ch 43 (1615).”

In this case of first impression, we conclude a defendant who intentionally pushes another person into the path of an oncoming vehicle has used that vehicle as a “deadly weapon” in violation of Penal Code section 245, subdivision (a)(1).

The jury convicted appellant Donald Russell of assault with a deadly weapon or by means of force likely to cause great bodily injury. Appellant raises three main arguments on appeal:…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Jackson v. VirginiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  2. People v. RodriguezCalifornia Supreme Court · 1999
  3. People v. AguilarCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
  4. People v. CarterNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
  5. Edwards v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. United States v. GrajedaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
  2. People v. PerezCalifornia Supreme Court · 2018
  3. People v. AznavolehCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2012
  4. People v. MillerCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
  5. People v. Marsh, California Court of Appeal, 5th District2019

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API