Legal Opinion
Turo v. Super. Ct.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 28, 2022No. A160200Published
1Opinion of the Court
Filed 6/28/22 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION TWO TURO INC., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE A160200 CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, (San Francisco County Super. Ct. No. CGC-18-563803) Respondent; THE PEOPLE ex rel. DENNIS J. HERRERA, as City Attorney, etc., et al., Real Parties in Interest. Turo Inc. operates an online platform that allows car owners to rent their cars to other Turo users. Unlike companies such as Enterprise or Hertz, Turo does not own, lease, or rent a fleet of cars for customers to…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Wasatch Property Management v. DegrateCalifornia Supreme Court · 2005
- MacIsaac v. Waste Management Collection & Recycling, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2005
- People v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 2006
- Skidgel v. Cal. Unemployment Ins. Appeals Bd.California Supreme Court · 2021
- City of Sacramento v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.