Legal Opinion
City of Sacramento v. Public Employees' Retirement System
California Court of Appeal
Decided February 16, 1994No. C013994PublishedCited by 43 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
from a judgment which declares that a 1987 amendment to the Public Employees’ Retirement Law, relating to enhanced pension benefits, applies to its employees without its election.
Sacramento, as an agency contracting with the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS), is subject to the Public Employees’ Retirement Law. Under that law employees classified as “local safety members” (§ 20019), 1 including “local firemen” (§ 20021), are entitled to enhanced pension benefits (§ 21252.01).
In 1987 the Legislature amended section 20021, expanding the class of “local firemen” from “active”…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- People v. KnowlesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1950
- People v. WoodheadCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Times Mirror Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991
- Betts v. Board of AdministrationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
- Mosk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by43 opinions
- People v. CruzCalifornia Supreme Court · 1996
- Western Security Bank v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1997
- City of Oakland v. Public Employees' Retirement SystemCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
- Siskiyou County Farm Bureau v. Department of Fish & WildlifeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Alameda County Flood Control & Water Conservation District v. Department of Water ResourcesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
38 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.